First published in November 2013

One thing which members of electorates may choose to consider is the tendency of their Government to sign up to legislation and guidelines laid down not just by the EU but by the United Nations.

In November 2013 the Office of the Children’s Commissioner recently released this report entitled “If only someone had listened” http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/content/publications/content_743 The report rattles off a series of statistics about children being involved in sex and sexual attacks etc, and the media put the sort of slant on it one would expect.

Attacks by children on children have continued to escalate since. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-2934981/Under-10s-committing-sex-crimes.html

But who is responsible? That very same Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC), in its own words at the start of the report, says that “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child underpins and frames all of our work”

That’s the same UN which in 2009 recommended that five year olds should be taught masturbation techniques. http://www.coe.int/t/ngo/Source/International_guidelines_on_sexuality_education_en.pdf

When the kids are being persuaded to explore sexuality before puberty, is it really such a surprise that these events are happening? And who benefits? For more news, please see 29 minutes in http://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-live-26th-november-2013

and http://www.foxnews.com/story/2009/08/26/un-report-advocates-teaching-masturbation-to-5-year-olds

Whilst the majority of those who work for the UN and EU do so in good faith both of those bodies undermine national sovereignty through mandates which are unrecognisable compared to those which were initially “sold” to the public.

Some call it communism, others call it fascism, but both the UN and EU were founded and funded by those who hold a view that the earth should be run by an elite few with one massive underclass of “serfs”. EU http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179902/Revealed-The-secret-report-shows-Nazis-planned-Fourth-Reich–EU.html

and UN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bngaUSZEMGU





Do you remember what David Rockefeller said in 1994? “It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the light of publicity during these years. But now the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards world Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

And what of UN Agenda 21?

“Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level”. – – George H. Bush http://patriotupdate.com/articles/totalitarian-program-agenda-21-now-in-effect/

Whether you are an individual, a business or a nation, your individual characteristics, quirks and talents are being nullified; communities are being undermined by “one size fits all” diktat, http://communitypressgroup.com/articles/the-global-society-from-my-bank-account-to-glasgow-celtic-one-size-fits-all/ ignoring the fact that everyone brings something to the table and square pegs don’t go into round holes. If employers can’t refuse applicants on the basis of gender, disability, intelligence, character or looks, we could have one legged postmen, Quasimodo winning Miss World, Stevie Wonder flying planes, Susan Boyle playing for Arsenal and Wayne Rooney running NASA.

When we were teenagers I had a mate whose girlfriend used to retire to bed at 2030 telling her parents she was tired, pop downstairs at 2130 asking them to turn the TV down because it was keeping her awake, and she’d be out on the town with him by 2200. Attack is the best form of defence. Accuse others of being what you are. If you want to feather your nest, accuse others of doing it. If you are a sex offender, enable legislation which allows a sex offenders register to contain the names of people who have not been convicted or tried. If you want inequality, preach equality. Burn down the Reichstag and accuse your opposition of doing it. Those claiming to propose Scottish independence are doing so with what are actually plans to suck the country into the EU behemoth. Those saying they are protecting freedoms are taking them away. Those promoting anti discrimination are doing so in a highly discriminatory fashion. Some of Guernsey’s suggested consensus Government changes are plans for at least as much of a minority dictatorship as Cabinet Government.

It seems to me that we’re being led to believe that somehow discrimination is automatically bad. I suggest that a society without discrimination would be lawless. All rules and laws discriminate. Outlawing stealing discriminates against kleptomaniacs; prohibiting murder discriminates against psychopaths; the offside law discriminates against attackers. Are these bad laws? If the nanny state wants to justify introducing legislation it has to do rather better than shouting “discrimination” and walking off.

Glasgow Celtic FC recently got into hot water with UEFA and reprimanded its own fans after they displayed political views on Bobby Sands and William Wallace at a game with AC Milan.“Fans should leave their political views at home, we are a football club” stormed the Celtic chief. Yet a few months prior, Celtic had released an official anti-racism video, and days later their fans, along with all others, gave a minute of their time before a game to applaud Nelson Mandela. No reprimand there, but hypocrisy in abundance. If you and I went to a game and one of us displayed a “support gay rights and kick out racism banner”, and the other displayed an “oppose gay rights and support racism banner”, only one of us would see the entire game. If that’s not discrimination, what is?

No one on the planet is with the majority view on every single issue. Why should the minority or individual view – and talent -not be expressed? Increasingly we are losing the right to disagree with the (often self appointed) global authorities with whom anyone who remains silent is taken to agree. That will result in a global fiefdom.

One currency, one tax authority, one food supplier, (and by the way, the Chairman of Nestle recently said that drinking water is not a human right and aspartame was declared safe by the EFSA) one religion, one communication system, one media etc. All privately owned by the friends and family of those who were given the exclusive right to create money out of thin air.

Does anybody care?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s